Earlier in February, Philip Cordery, member of the French Parliament, had published an article (en,de) criticising the "antisocial policy of the EPO" and sent aletter (en,de)) to European Commisionner Elzbieta Bienkowska calling upon her to intervene.

Philip Cordery has now published the letter of reply (printable version) from Elzbieta Bienkowska. She wrote:

• "The European Patent Organization (the "Organization"), of which the EPO is the executive body, is an independent international institution, which has no organic links with the European Union. [...] The Commission has only the role of an observer within [the EPO's Administrative Council].
• "I have been informed of the social tensions which have transpired between the management of the EPO and the staff representatives, and which have been widely reported in the press."
• "The EPO will be in charge of the issue and management of the Unitary European Patent. With this in mind, I have issued instructions to my staff who represent the European Commission as observers on the Administrative Council to monitor the developments of the situation closely."
• "I have also requested the President of the EPO to make every effort to return to a constructive social dialogue."

Translations in English, German and Dutch are available by scrolling through the document.

The Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) is the representative organisation of more than 1 million European lawyers through its member bars and law societies from 32 full member countries, and 13 further associate and observer countries.In a letter addressed to Mr Jesper Kongstad (Chairman of the Administrative Council) on 15 May 2015, CBBE comments on the Structural Reform of the Boards of Appeal proposed by Mr Battistelli. Among the concerns are:

• "We would encourage the Administrative Council to seek its own independent legal advice on constitutional law. It should not rely on advice obtained by the President of the EPO."
• "In the interests of perceived independence, it is highly desirable, both in dealing with these reforms and more generally, for any communications to be seen to come either from the Council or from the President, but not to be presented as a joint position."

The European Patent Lawyers Association (EPLAW) is"in full agreement with the comments" of CBBE and has sent them by letter to Mr Battistelli on 4 June 2015.

IPKat comments on these letters and still considers that relocating the Boards of Appeal in a different city from the rest of the EPO "would be folly".

Nederlands Juristenblad, a Dutch legal magazine, published an article about the judgment of the Dutch Court of Appeal in the case SUEPO v EPO:

"The Court of Appeal in The Hague has created an international precedent in the case against EPO by rejecting the immunity of an international organisation in a collective labour law case, and also awarding the claims on their merits, based on the fact that the organisation in question violated fundamental human rights.This decision is important because it further institutionalises the accountability of international organisations.Unfortunately the Netherlands also showed itself at its most narrow-minded: the Minister instructed the bailiff to not enforce the judgement because the organisation enjoys immunity from enforcement under international law. This instruction not only erodes the separation of powers stipulated by the Constitution, it isn't an obligation under international law either: as is the case for immunity from jurisdiction, immunity from enforcement can only be granted if the organisation adequately protects fundamental rights."

Translations in English and French are available by scrolling through the document.

Público, a spanish newspaper, published anarticle (printable version) titled"The European Patent Office is violating labour laws, according to the employees".

The article reports on the authoritarian drift of the European Patent Office under the presidency of Mr Battistelli with the introduction of aninvestigation unit (supported by Control Risks), the increase in disciplinary procedures and the violation of fundamental rights of staff with the latest health care reform (lack of confidentiality of medical records and house arrests for invalids).

Translations in English, French, German and Dutch can be found by scrolling through the document.

The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung reports on the information that the EPO has commissioned the company Control Risks to investigate elected representatives of the Staff Committee and/or Staff Union:

"Control Risks ist in Deutschland nicht unbekannt. Es soll das Unternehmen gewesen sein, das angeblich für die Deutsche Telekom Journalisten bespitzelte, um an Kontaktpersonen aus dem Konzern heranzukommen, die Informationen nach außen durchgestochen haben sollen."

"Dass es aber ausgerechnet Control Risks sein musste, die da ausgewählt wurde, hat an einigen Stellen des Hauses – gelinde ausgedrückt – Magengrummeln ausgelöst.Es wird als "unglückliche Wahl" bezeichnet. Und es wird nicht gerade als förderlich für eine gute Verhandlungsatmosphäre zwischen Präsident und Gewerkschaften betrachtet, dass nun ausgerechnet ein Personalvertreter Gegenstand von Ermittlungen wegen vermeintlicher Mobbingvorwürfe ist."

Translations in English,French andDutch are available by scrolling through the document.